How to what?
Get onto the gold standard.
Set up a Court of Record
How can we do this when the good and the great of the past two or three millennia have failed to do these things on a grand scale?
The socio politico economico system we now behold is entirely flawed.
Yet we support it, we argue with bits of it, we complain of it to each other ...
Yet we support it.
Some say the blame lies with money and one or more 'ism's such as socialism or capitalism that is at fault - if not the root of all evil.
The 'ism's and real money are not the problem.
Some say it is the innate greed in we the people that is the cause of the breakdowns in our basic ground of being. We are not the problem.
We need not be Sherlock Holmes to see the reasons. It is lying and stealing and damaging other people's property and good name that is in ever plainer sight that is the problem.
We can deduce from there. Indeed we must deduce from here where we stand now.
This page is to explain in brief the 'how to' of going on a deliverable, voluntary gold standard. For over a century the enormously complex systems required to issue a nation's money have been subcontracted to private corporations who are still eager to maintain control of this function. Without going into detail here it appears that they have made a mess of it so we have worked out systems over the past few years that incorporate the latest technology. This will make it available to all who wish to trade honestly on the gold standard.
We provide links to further detail, legal and historical, in other pages, manuals and just descriptions of the facts and figures that will engender trust in the methodology.
The intention of this site overall is to enact history in whatever we do with the truth in mind
'Truth is the highest thing that Man may keep'
The English used on this site we just call 'Free English'. Authors use what Englishes they want to get their idea over. Be it street, formal, business or legal.
Because we live in a global society there may be questions so please refer to the Q&A which we will build upon questions asked. Meantime please ask questions with a view to clarification. Do understand that we are practically biased and this site is not here to simply educate the curious who do not wish to participate. We are not a debating society, please do not mistake this for a student forum.
It is important to bear in mind that common men and women are schooled to be ignorant of the true meaning of words as well as the finer points of common law. To be truly conversant with the understanding of the law, it is necessary to fully understand the meaning of the words we use in our everyday language.
The foundation of truth lies in the meaning of the words that created the word of the law in the first place.
Dictionaries available on the Web are continually being trimmed and 'modernised' so that determining the true meaning of the word can be difficult. There are directories of etymology, thesaurusand dictionaries. References to the true sources are disappearing rapidly from the libraries as well as from the Net. However with practice it becomes obvious to determine the difference between cheap traffic-collection info sources and sites where care has been taken to hold to the truth of the word.
Communicating the exact intention and precise meaning, the Thesaurus, being a list of synonyms or verbal equivalents, is a vital tool.The first draft of the Thesaurus was written in 1805. For a period of 47 years Dr. Peter Mark Roget used his manuscript for his personal reference. In 1852 he published his great work.
The illustration shows how it was created with the negative of the word being researched at the same time. Originally the book was published in two columns which reveals the truth of the meaning to a deeper level. Project Gutenberg has an online searchable copy which is useful but has been expurgated, changed and added to by a student. If you can find an original one it is a brilliant tool - the older the edition the better.
Websters Dictionary project was started in America shortly after Roget began his work . This is the most respected work in the US and online. Here again it is best to obtain early editions.
The Chambers Dictionary (TCD) is the most respected, complete and useful dictionary of the English language. it was first published in Scotland in 1872 Chambers first published an etymological dictionary in 1867 and this is the best reference work in etymology to this day.
Oxford dictionary. Meantime in England books of listed 'registered' words in England were so poor that by 1850's Coleridge and some colleagues began to create a complete dictionary. Shortly after the group published the first sample pages Coleridge met an early death aged 31 and the 54-pigeon-holes where he kept his references was decimated. In 1880 the Oxford University Press took up the project and at the turn of the century the Oxford dictionary was published as the 'official' university reference.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary John Bouvier (1787–1851) was born in Codogno, France, but came to the United States at an early age. He became a U.S. citizen in 1812, was admitted to the bar in 1818, and began practicing law in Philadelphia. During his years of practice and study, he noticed the lack of a solid American law dictionary. He decided to fill this need, and worked on a new law dictionary incessantly for 10 years. One of his main goals was to distinguish American law from its English antecedent.
Blacks Law Dictionary was first published in 1891, and the second edition in 1910. The sixth and earlier editions of the book also provided case citations for the term cited, which some lawyers view as its most useful feature, providing a useful starting point with leading cases. We recommend that you obtain the second edition.
Attention has to be placed on observing the picture closest to you and sharing this as such with those you work with per se. Full attention is the genius in the whole matrix. The efficacy of common law is that it is universally applicable across all situations and countries.
Sir William Jones, an English judge in India, and one of the most learned judges that ever lived, learned in Asiatic as well as European law, says:
"It is pleasing to remark the similarity, or, rather, the identity, of those conclusions which pure, unbiased reason, in all ages and nations, seldom fails to draw, in such juridical inquiries as are not fettered and manacled by positive institutions."
Sir William Jones
In common sense, as in common law, it requires the energy flow of questions pertinent to the situation in hand. In fact these questions are to be discrete to the situation in hand, ignoring the common wisdom pelting in from the media.
The key to learning, expanding the brain, having more ipso facto dots to join, pushing the envelope, passing unnoticed through the glass ceiling, the key to learning is full attention on the matter in hand. How else can you remember word for word the entire conversation? Full attention requires no energy of its own, rather, it gives energy back.
It assists the attainment of full focus to relieve the mind of subterranean thoughts, the chiding, critical little voices - instructing on how and what to do next - as before. This can be alleviated by meditation and such. Meantime best rely on some old fashioned adrenalin. That focuses the mind wonderfully - as does joy and love, giving back a buzz of energy from thoughts of the highest qualities in men and women.
Truth, Love, Power, Integrity, Honour, Service, Virtue, Grace, Joy, Intelligence / Senses, Courage, Vision, Loyalty - do these words attract attention? Are they not attractive? Do men and women travel for miles to behold the presence of any one of them?
WINNING AGAINST ALL ODDS
Everyone adore stories of the little guy winning against all odds with not a few mistakes into the bargain. There is David and Goliath, but we're not out to kill. There is Jason and the ancient Greek Argonauts - a collection of many of these stories on an epic voyage. The crew were heros and as such they came with multiple predators.
The spirit lives on in humanity. A nice example is the HMS Pickle - an English schooner that delivered the dispatches of the Battle of Trafalgar.
It was commanded by a resolute Cornishman Captain John Richards Lapenotière. With right on his side he turned aside from Captain Sykes' demand to hand over the dispatches as a superior officer. Lapenotière had been personally commissioned to deliver the news of Trafalgar's success and he had been commanded to relay the loss of Nelson also. And so he did.
There was a prize of 500 pounds to the person to deliver the news. Captain Sykes decided to race for the enormous prize even without the despatches. He had a vastly superior vessel - or so the thought. He raced for the prize alone whereas Captain Lapenotière had the zest of the service and duty to his commanding officer - Nelson's deputy.
I dare say he was motivated by more energy giving forces to pull off the feat of getting to London from Falmouth in 37 hours. Normally a 4-6 day trip post haste. Would he have won by half an hour with the motivation of mere greed?
We love this story with a happy ending. Poor Jason brought back the fleece only to lose everything in the end. Was the re-capture of the golden fleece the start of an epoch? There was no word of him having a happy life. It was a tale of one tribulation after another. So of all the little guy successes it's the Pickle for us.
The reason there was no heroic aftermath for the returning warriors after Trafalgar was because they were all confined to their ships with no wages, food or treatment for their wounds. Captains pawned and sold their silver to try to keep them alive but the treasury didn't have enough money to pay for their release - so they mostly died.
The story of the Pickle had a happy ending. There will be no abandonment of heroes with a GSF sponsored programme for rehabilitating returning warriors in an honest trade system and getting them on their feet to create their own living. We are already moving to do that for the homeless but that's another conversation some time.
After the Battle of Waterloo the returning warriors faced a massive financial crisis because the news was leaked by Rothschild that the war had been lost so everybody sold cheap and the losses to the people were legion. Their money was ruthlessly pillaged as before by the same Rothschilds who bought cheap.. In addition it's happening again. The 'Plunge Protection Team' is buying at lowest prices again with the pretense of propping up the market - depressed by what exactly? Legal Plunder. See Finality of Settlement series.
Questions like this have a way of answering themselves as the picture evolves with time.
Onward with the how-to. We the many, we the small, with an edge of je ne sais quoi, setting up a court of Record - Using common Law which is the law of final settlement. Simply put, when delivered substance is traded for delivered substance in an agreed upon trade, finality of settlement is present. When finality of settlement is present in all transactions, society trades harmoniously and disputes are at a minimum.
In the case where there is damage caused by one party to another, right and wrong have to be determined, and the circular units of a dead 'corporate' 'legal' 'money' or 'court' system are no longer viable, then one has to re-discover a Court of Record.
In brief, final settlement is the state achieved when all the records have been read, the damage is assessed and the way to correct problems and sentences are on public notice. From that point the offender knows what they must do to restore damages and pay penalties in gold to the aggrieved men and women within honestly agreed margins. This is similar to finality of settlement in trade that is discussed in Let Justice Roll Down.
If they have no money then they have to work for it for only a subsistence rate until their debt is paid with no interest.
Justice is seen to be pronounced upon all the records obtained by and provided to the Court of Record during it's enquiry and thus to the grand jury of 24 men and women on the land as designed by the Magna Carta.
SETTING UP A COURT OF RECORD
The setting up of a court of Record is a practical matter rather than something to be studied academically. This page is for those who have a need to set something straight whether it is a large and small issue. The impetus to do it is wanting justice and reparation for damage or loss or to right a wrong.
The primary function is the process of fact finding and that is founded on questions raised that have to be answered to ascertain the truth.
Questions have to be asked and faithfully recorded in a book of records. Hearsay is disregarded and off public face. In other words it is not written down.
We need help doing new things it's true. It unlikely to find a lawyer who will champion a cause using a court of record. If you can find one that can create pertinent questions that can be answered yea yea and nay nay then you can retain them for fees paid in gold.
You must find a public notary to witness for you as an interface to the currently adopted system. Three men and women can act as witness in the place of a notary. Oaths are not a good thing. What you want to create is an Affidavit.
In the end we do it all ourself. Clerks and Bondsmen are paid in agreed amounts of gold and silver for their services or goods, to be paid on agreed completion dates & times of delivery. A brief description of goods and services shall be rendered on the contractual, written, bill of record.
No lawyers needed.
There is plenty of help at hand and people to talk to about framing questions and tips on how to reach people you want to question. You do not know these people - you have never met. That is a good thing - only strictly relevant proven fact is written down on the record.
You may ask yourself:
What is right and what is wrong about a particular situation?
Are the deliverables clearly specified for both parties to the contract?
Can you define the deliverable? How does the deliverable come into existence? In other words, what is a Great British Pound? or United States Dollar? or Euro? If you cannot define it and explain how that deliverable comes into existence, was there a meeting of minds regarding the contract? What is the underlying consideration for the contract?
Did one of the parties have the ability to overcome the limitations of nature? This is called running of limitations and is fraud. For example, was the substance adulterated? Were material facts withheld? Was there misrepresentation as to the nature of the deliverable? There is no statute of limitations for fraud.
What is my need or right to know?
Surely those with offices of the houses of parliament are the authority? They seem to claim that they are my representatives. Are they? Have they seen to it that the money bills that are passed are about lawful money? Have they safeguarded the right to discharge debts at law, that is, in deliverable, verifiable substance? By neglecting this duty have they committed high treason against those they claim to represent?
"Am I not on a par with the post boy by comparison?". At common law all men and women are truly equal. None have the right to defraud the other. They have a right to do with and on their property as they see fit. A postboy has rights to ask these questions equally. A cat may look at a King.
For example we want to ask Gordon Brown, the former British Prime Minister, to whom he sold the people's gold bullion? And how much was there? Why did he sell it at rock bottom prices? Is it possible that he behaved treasonously?
The momentum of holding him accountable would be taken over by concerned persons who were directly affected by the actions he admitted he committed.
There are those that want to see him severely punished.
It is my right to know and I must put my desire to know on public record by creating a deed as outlined by the Magna Carta which is the foundation of common law in many parts of the world. There is a requirement to honourably inform other parties and persons affected by the outcome or by the process itself. Such a public notice has been given and is in the process of being served.
WHAT IS THE POWER OF A COURT OF RECORD?
A true Court of Record is a superior court to any other form of court. It has original jurisdiction to determine right and wrong.
From the highest viewpoint it is the establishment of the Truth in a matter of wrongdoing.
In practical terms, the men and women of the tribunal determine what is the just outcome of a given problem. In a Court of Record, the tribunal is independent of the magistrate.
A signature is a mark of identity and intent. With today's advanced technology almost any mark can be forged. The solution is a PGP seal to establish strong mathematically provable mark of identity and intent.
This useful, for example, to conduct a Court of Record with a jury of qualified people separated by time and space. Another example could be to authenticate yourself to take delivery of gold Globals.
Common law underpins the Court of Record. There is material to read in great detail covered in the Finality of Settlement series from the Magna Carta to contemporary efforts by people in America.
The beauty of the common law process is that it is self correcting. We know that there are people in America working to correct the mistakes there. Here are some of the mistakes (1) Trying to maintain the 'credit' of the people and (2) Trying to 'restore' a dead legal fiction that was originally set up for trafficking in persons.
Common law is led by the requirement to find the truth appertaining to the crime and applicable to the situation. It is not the other way around as in legal law which has multifarious boxes into which every situation is forced to fit.
Common law used to be taught at Law school. There are many people who appear to be teaching common law. It can be seen that common law is not in active practice by the men and women on land. Clearly, if you do not pay with deliverable substance for service at the clerk of a court, you are not in a Court of Record.
Courts of Record should not be hasty to come to conclusions regarding the financial war that is going on.