HOW TO

 

This page is to explain in brief the 'how to' of going on a deliverable, voluntary gold standard. For over a century the enormously complex systems required to issue a nation's money have been subcontracted to private corporations who are still eager to maintain control of this function. Without going into detail here it appears that they have made a mess of it so we have worked out systems over the past few years that incorporate the latest technology. This will make it available to all who wish to trade honestly on the gold standard. 

 

We provide links to further detail, legal and historical, in other pages, manuals and just descriptions of the facts and figures that will engender trust in the methodology.

 

The English used on this site we just call 'Free English'. Authors use what  Englishes they want to get their idea over. Be it street, formal, business or legal.

 

Because we live in a global society there may be questions so please refer to the Q&A which we will build upon questions asked. Meantime please ask questions with a view to clarification. Do understand that we are practically biased and this site is not here to simply educate the curious who do not wish to participate. We are not a debating society, please do not mistake this for a student forum.

 

It is important to bear in mind that common men and women are schooled to be ignorant of the true meaning of words as well as the finer points of common law. To be truly conversant with the understanding of the law, it is necessary to fully understand the meaning of the words we use in our everyday language.

 

The foundation of truth lies in the meaning of the words that created the word of the law in the first place.

Dictionaries available on the Web are continually being trimmed and 'modernised' so that determining the true meaning of the word can be difficult. There are directories of etymology, thesaurusand dictionaries. References to the true sources are disappearing rapidly from the libraries as well as from the Net. However with practice it becomes obvious to determine the difference between cheap traffic-collection info sources and sites where care has been taken to hold to the truth of the word.

 

Communicating the exact intention and precise meaning, the Thesaurus, being a list of synonyms or verbal equivalents, is a vital tool.The first draft of the Thesaurus was written in 1805. For a period of 47 years Dr. Peter Mark Roget used his manuscript for his personal reference. In 1852 he published his great work.

 

The illustration shows how it was created with the negative of the word being researched at the same time. Originally the book was published in two columns which reveals the truth of the meaning to a deeper level. Project Gutenberg has an online searchable copy which is useful but has been expurgated, changed and added to by a student. If you can find an original one it is a brilliant tool - the older the edition the better.

Websters Dictionary project was started in America shortly after Roget began his work . This is the most respected work in the US and online. Here again it is best to obtain early editions.

 

The Chambers Dictionary (TCD) is the most respected, complete and useful dictionary of the English language. it was first published in Scotland in 1872 Chambers first published an etymological dictionary in 1867 and this is the best reference work in etymology to this day. 

 

Oxford dictionary. Meantime in England books of listed 'registered' words in England were so poor that by 1850's Coleridge and some colleagues began to create a complete dictionary. Shortly after the group published the first sample pages Coleridge met an early death aged 31 and the 54-pigeon-holes where he kept his references was decimated. In 1880 the Oxford University Press took up the project and at the turn of the century the Oxford dictionary was published as the 'official' university reference.

Bouvier's Law Dictionary John Bouvier (1787–1851) was born in Codogno, France,[citation needed] but came to the United States at an early age. He became a U.S. citizen in 1812, was admitted to the bar in 1818, and began practicing law in Philadelphia. During his years of practice and study, he noticed the lack of a solid American law dictionary. He decided to fill this need, and worked on a new law dictionary incessantly for 10 years. One of his main goals was to distinguish American law from its English antecedent.

 

Blacks Law Dictionary  was first published in 1891, and the second edition in 1910. The sixth and earlier editions of the book also provided case citations for the term cited, which some lawyers view as its most useful feature, providing a useful starting point with leading cases. We recommend that you obtain the second edition.

 

 "It  is pleasing to remark the similarity, or, rather, the identity, of those conclusions which pure, unbiased reason, in all ages and nations, seldom fails to draw, in such juridical inquiries as are not fettered and manacled by positive institutions."

Sir William Jones

 

There was a prize of 500 pounds to the person to deliver the news. Captain Sykes decided to race for the enormous prize even without the despatches. He had a vastly superior vessel - or so the thought. He raced for the prize alone whereas Captain Lapenotière had the zest of the service and duty to his commanding officer - Nelson's deputy. 

 

I dare say he was motivated by more energy giving forces to pull off the feat of getting to London from Falmouth in 37 hours. Normally a 4-6 day trip post haste. Would he have won by half an hour with the motivation of mere greed?

 

We love this story with a happy ending. Poor Jason brought back the fleece only to lose everything in the end. Was the re-capture of the golden fleece the start of an epoch? There was no word of him having a happy life. It was a tale of one tribulation after another. So of all the little guy successes it's the Pickle for us.

 

The reason there was no heroic aftermath for the returning warriors after Trafalgar was because they were all confined to their ships with no wages, food or treatment for their wounds. Captains pawned and sold their silver to try to keep them alive but the treasury didn't have enough money to pay for their release - so they mostly died. 

 

The story of the Pickle had a happy ending. There will be no abandonment of heroes with a GSF sponsored programme for rehabilitating returning warriors in an honest trade system and getting them on their feet to create their own living. We are already moving to do that for the homeless but that's another conversation some time.

 

The setting up of a court of Record is a practical matter rather than something to be studied academically. This page is for those who have a need to set something straight whether it is a large and small issue. The impetus to do it is wanting justice and reparation for damage or loss or to right a wrong.

 

The primary function is the process of fact finding and that is founded on questions raised that have to be answered to ascertain the truth.

 

Questions have to be asked and faithfully recorded in a book of records. Hearsay is disregarded and off public face. In other words it is not written down.

 

We need help doing new things it's true. It unlikely to find a lawyer who will champion a cause using a court of record. If you can find one that can create pertinent questions that can be answered yea yea and nay nay then you can retain them for fees paid in gold.

 

You must find a public notary to witness for you as an interface to the currently adopted system.  Three men and women can act as witness in the place of a notary. Oaths are not a good thing. What you want to create is an Affidavit.

 

In the end we do it all ourself. Clerks and Bondsmen are paid in agreed amounts of gold and silver for their services or goods, to be paid on agreed completion dates & times of delivery. A brief description of goods and services shall be rendered on the contractual, written, bill of record.

 

No lawyers needed.

 

There is plenty of help at hand and people to talk to about framing questions and tips on how to reach people you want to question. You do not know these people - you have never met. That is a good thing - only strictly relevant proven fact is written down on the record.

 

You may ask yourself:

 

What is right and what is wrong about a particular situation?

 

Are the deliverables clearly specified for both parties to the contract?

 

Can you define the deliverable? How does the deliverable come into existence? In other words, what is a Great British Pound? or United States Dollar? or Euro? If you cannot define it and explain how that deliverable comes into existence, was there a meeting of minds regarding the contract? What is the underlying consideration for the contract? 

 

Did one of the parties have the ability to overcome the limitations of nature? This is called running of limitations and is fraud.  For example, was the substance adulterated? Were material facts withheld? Was there misrepresentation as to the nature of the deliverable? There is no statute of limitations for fraud.

 

What is my need or right to know?

 

Surely those with offices of the houses of parliament are the authority? They seem to claim that they are my representatives. Are they? Have they seen to it that the money bills that are passed are about lawful money? Have they safeguarded the right to discharge debts at law, that is, in deliverable, verifiable substance? By neglecting this duty have they committed high treason against those they claim to represent?

 

"Am I not on a par with the post boy by comparison?". At common law all men and women are truly equal. None have the right to defraud the other. They have a right to do with and on  their property as they see fit. A postboy has rights to ask these questions equally. A cat may look at a King.

 

For example we want to ask Gordon Brown, the former British Prime Minister, to whom he sold the people's gold bullion? And how much was there? Why did he sell it at rock bottom prices?  Is it possible that he behaved treasonously?

 

The momentum of holding him accountable would be taken over by concerned persons who were directly affected by the actions he admitted he committed.

 

There are those that want to see him severely punished.

 

It is my right to know and I must put my desire to know on public record by creating a deed as outlined by the Magna Carta which is the foundation of common law in many parts of the world. There is a requirement to honourably inform other parties and persons affected by the outcome or by the process itself. Such a public notice has been given and is in the process of being served.

 

A true Court of Record is a superior court to any other form of court. It has original jurisdiction to determine right and wrong.

 

From the highest viewpoint it is the establishment of the Truth in a matter of wrongdoing. 

 

In practical terms, the men and women of the tribunal determine what is the just outcome of a given problem. In a Court of Record, the tribunal is independent of the magistrate. 

 

A signature is a mark of identity and intent. With today's advanced technology almost any mark can be forged. The solution is a PGP seal to establish strong mathematically provable mark of identity and intent.

 

This useful, for example, to conduct a Court of Record with a jury of qualified people separated by time and space. Another example could be to authenticate yourself to take delivery of gold Globals. 

Common law underpins the Court of Record. There is material to read in great detail covered in the Finality of Settlement series from the Magna Carta to contemporary efforts by people in America.

 

The beauty of the common law process is that it is self correcting. We know that there are people in America working to correct the mistakes there. Here are some of the mistakes (1) Trying to maintain the 'credit' of the people and (2) Trying to 'restore' a dead legal fiction that was originally set up for trafficking in persons. 

 

Common law is led by the requirement to find the truth appertaining to the crime and applicable to the situation. It is not the other way around as in legal law which has multifarious boxes into which every situation is forced to fit.

 

Common law used to be taught at Law school. There are many people who appear to be teaching common law. It can be seen that common law is not in active practice by the men and women on land. Clearly, if you do not pay with deliverable substance for service at the clerk of a court, you are not in a Court of Record.

 

Courts of Record should not be hasty to come to conclusions regarding the financial war that is going on.